SpeechPathology.com Phone: 800-242-5183


Presence Thinking About - November 2024

The Role of Vowels in the Discrimination Abilities of Bilingual Adults and Children

The Role of Vowels in the Discrimination Abilities of Bilingual Adults and Children
Sandra Levey, PhD
October 17, 2005
Share:

Abstract

The discrimination of English vowel contrasts in real and novel words by 101 bilingual Spanish/English- and native English-speaking adults and children was examined. Bilingual-speaking adults and children had significant difficulty with certain English vowel contrasts, while native English participants had none. The vowels that affected discrimination accuracy were those absent from Spanish and those more similar to one another in the F1-F2 acoustic range.

The main non-linguistic factors that affected bilingual-speaking adult and children's discrimination accuracy were the age of acquisition of English and the overall percentage of time devoted to communication in English. While production tends to be the focus of most practitioners working with second language learners, these results suggest practitioners should consider discrimination and vowel quality when working with second language learners with speech or language disorders.

Introduction

The ability to discriminate sounds of a second language (L2) is essential to the acquisition of a new language. Some sounds in a learner's first language (L1) may be absent from the new language, and sounds of the new language may be absent from the learner's first language. Another factor that may affect discrimination is the variation among native L2 speakers in their production of sounds. Vowels are affected by dialect variation more often than consonants (MacKay, 1997), evidenced in the variability in the production of these sounds by native L2 speakers (Hillenbrand, Getty, Clark, & Wheeler, 1995). Vowels more similar to one another also may present difficulty, such as the vowels found in the words pod and pawed. These vowel contrasts present discrimination difficulty for children (Levey & Schwartz, 2002) and adults (Flege, 1991; Hillenbrand & Gayvert, 1993; Hillenbrand et al., 1995; Levey, 2004; Levey & Cruz, 2004; Lieberman & Blumstein, 1988). In contrast, the more dissimilar vowels /i/ and /u/, found in the words beat and boot, are discriminated with greater accuracy (Bond & Robey, 1983; Levey, 2004; Levey & Schwartz; Polka, Jusczyk, & Rvachew, 1995).

The ability to discriminate vowels derives from their acoustic cues. These cues allow listeners to identify and/or discriminate vowels based on their formant frequencies (Borden, Harris, & Raphael, 2003). A formant is defined as a peak of resonance in the vocal tract. The first (F1) and second (F2) formants of the vowel produced by a speaker, and the relationship between these formants, play an important role in vowel identification. While there is variabiality in the production of vowels, the vowel /i/ is always produced with a low frequency first formant and a high frequency second formant. In contrast, the vowel /u/ is always produced with a lower first and second formant than the vowel /i/, with a smaller frequency gap between these formants. These differences result in a listener's ability to discriminate these vowel contrasts. The difficulty in discriminating certain vowel contrasts, such as /-/ and //, is based on their closer proximity or adjacency to one another in the F1-F2 acoustic range (Bond & Robey, 1983; Hillenbrand & Gayvert, 1993). The greater distance between vowels in this acoustic range, such as /i/ and /u/, allows a listener to discriminate these vowel contrasts with greater accuracy (Bond & Robey, 1983).

Non-linguistic factors may also affect discrimination, such as more experience with, and earlier age of acquisition of, L2. Experience with L2 may provide more opportunities to interact with native L2 speakers, thus leading to more accurate discrimination and production of sounds in L2 (Best & Strange, 1992; Flege, Bohn, & Jang, 1997; Flege, 1993; Flege & Liu, 2001; Kuhl & Iverson, 1995). There is a consensus among investigators that earlier age of acquisition provides an advantage, given early exposure to L2 (Flege, 1992; Singleton, 1995). Other factors may correlate with skills in discrimination or speech sound production, such as the motivation to learn a new language. However, discrimination has been found to be a significant factor in learning a new language L2 (Flege, 1987, 1992, 1995; Flege & Liu, 2001). In spite of this finding, production continues to be the focus of most practitioners who provide services to L2 learners (Rochet, 1995), often ignoring the possibility of difficulty in the perception of the differences of sounds.


Sandra Levey, PhD

Sandra Levey, Ph.D., speech-language pathologist and linguist, is an assistant professor in the Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, Lehman College of the City University of New York. Phonology, perception, and bilingualism are her main areas of research and interest.



Related Courses

ApPARENTly This Is Not Going Well: Difficult Conversations with Parents
Presented by Marva Mount, MA, CCC-SLP
Video
Course: #9726Level: Intermediate1 Hour
This course explores emotional intelligence (EQ) and how to "plug in" and use it in situations that go awry with parents of clients. Specific strategies for handling difficult situations and de-escalating arguments are discussed.

Ethics of Accent Modification
Presented by Robert McKinney, MA, CCC-SLP
Video
Course: #10505Level: Introductory1.5 Hours
Targeted phonological instruction (i.e., “accent modification”) provided by SLPs may help non-native speaking adults communicate more effectively in their new language, but can also prompt ethical concerns. The nature of accents, their connection to linguistic discrimination, and best practices for ethical provision of elective accent modification services are discussed in this course.

Standardized Assessment Limitations: Part 1
Presented by Angie Neal, MS, CCC-SLP
Video
Course: #10257Level: Intermediate1.5 Hours
This is Part 1 of a two-part series. Specific features of assessment tools that facilitate accurate identification of disability, the limitations of standardized assessments for this purpose, and implications for determining eligibility under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) are described in this course.

Standardized Assessment Limitations: Part 2
Presented by Angie Neal, MS, CCC-SLP
Video
Course: #10258Level: Intermediate1.5 Hours
This is Part 2 of a two-part series. This course discusses evidence-based options for assessment that can be used as alternatives to standardized assessments, in order to determine the presence of a disability under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Methods of collecting and using assessment data to write effective treatment goals are also described.

20Q: A Continuum Approach for Sorting Out Processing Disorders
Presented by Gail J. Richard, PhD, CCC-SLP
Text
Course: #10008Level: Intermediate1 Hour
There is a good deal of confusion among audiologists and speech-language pathologists when a diagnosis of “processing disorder” is introduced. This course presents a continuum model to differentiate processing disorders into acoustic, phonemic, or linguistic aspects so that assessment and treatment can become more focused and effective. The roles of audiologists and SLPs in relation to processing disorders are described, and compensatory strategies for differing aspects of processing are presented.

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience. By using our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.