SpeechPathology.com Phone: 800-242-5183


Presence Thinking About - November 2024

Navigating the Requirements of Special Education Eligibility

Navigating the Requirements of Special Education Eligibility
Lissa Power-deFur, PhD, CCC-SLP, BCS-CL, ASHA Fellow
July 20, 2016
Share:

Editor’s Note: This text-based course is a transcript of the webinar, “Navigating the Requirements of Special Education Eligibility” presented by Lissa Power-deFur. Learner OutcomesAs a result of this Continuing Education Activity, participants will be able to:1)  Identify the criteria that must be met to be found eligible for special education and related services2)  Explain strategies for identifying the educational impact of a speech-language impairment3)  Describe ways to effectively collaborate with teams during eligibility meetings Introduction and Overview I had an opportunity to write an article for the ASHA Leader a few years ago, which stemmed from my work at the Department of Education. While there, I provided technical assistance on the issue of children with speech-language impairment. Why do they have a disability that we find in our own work but the eligibility team does not find them eligible for special education services? I had an opportunity to do a webinar with SpeechPathology.com shortly after that article came out and I was delighted they asked me to update it for you today. You probably have had situations where you have been frustrated that the child on your case load with articulation issues, is not found eligible for speech and language services under special education. Perhaps your eligibility team looked at developmental norms, or they determined that it’s not causing a problem in the classroom. Maybe their stance is that the student performed well on all the assessments, and they moved on from grade to grade. On the other hand, maybe you’re having a challenge with an older student. There may be a child with intellectual disabilities who you believe has plateaued. They have received great services from the special education teacher, and they are working on transition. In your opinion, you believe it’s time for that student to be dismissed, and the dismissal isn’t going smoothly. Perhaps these are some of the challenges you’ve been facing. We will address these challenges in today’s presentation.           First, I will review some federal requirements. Next, I will touch on state requirements. We will move to the evaluation process, and how to gather data about educational impact. We’ll then move on to related services. We will discuss conclusion of eligibility and working in a team. I’ll end with a couple of applications with some case studies. I have found when I talk on this topic, that I get lots of questions and many times your questions are perfect for application. Federal Requirements To begin at the federal level, we will look at the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The word “education” was added with the last re-authorization. The purpose of IDEA is to find children eligible who need to receive a Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)I want to step back for a moment and review the events that occurred back in 1975 when this law was first passed. It was originally named the Education of All Handicapped Children Act. Going back even further in time to the first half of 1954, schools were still racially segregated. In the Brown v. the Board of Education U.S. Supreme Court case, on May 17, 1954, it was ruled unanimously that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional. Once schools became integrated, one of the arguments made before the U.S. Supreme Court was now that public schools are required to educate children of all races, we must also begin educating children with disabilities. The cases that followed involved children with disabilities who were not invited to school, who were excluded from school, and who had horrendous facilities. The civil rights that were provided to all Americans through the Civil Rights Act in 1965, was eventually extended to include the Education of All Handicapped Children Act. The entire purpose of free appropriate public education is to provide free of charge whatever education that is deemed appropriate for each child’s needs. In other words, the parents don’t need to pay tuition for their child to get special education services. This is a funding law – states are not required to participate. They can choose not to receive the funding; however, I don’t imagine that would go over very well. The reaction from parents would likely be inflammatory if states decided to pull out of this. If states and localities want to get the federal funding, they must comply with all the requirements of IDEA. It’s important to recognize that federal funding has never met the full cost of special education. It has never even met the hoped-for level of funding when the law was passed. I think it was hoped it would cover up to 40% of special education costs. It has peaked at over 20% periodically in our history, but the percentage of coverage mainly languishes in the upper teens and lower 20s. Every Student Succeeds ActI do want to mention the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). You might recognize it as No Child Left Behind. Before that, it was the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). It was the civil rights act which first involved the Federal Government in ensuring that all children received equal education. Early Intervention ServicesI do want to point out a couple of things that were added to the ESSA. There is stronger language on early intervention services which states that IDEA funds should be used for SLPs and other personnel to help struggling learners in the general education classroom. In other words, we can provide assistance even for children who are not eligible. Up to 15% of IDEA funds can be used for children at risk of being identified with a disability and referred for special education. LiteracyThe literacy section of Every Student Succeeds Act replaces some of the Early Reading First that was found in IDEA and No Child Left Behind. Again, it allows all professional staff (including SLPs and audiologists) to support literacy. ESSA funds can be used for collaboration to plan comprehensive literacy instruction. I just received an email this morning that ASHA has now produced a policy document on understanding this particular act. If that’s...


lissa power defur

Lissa Power-deFur, PhD, CCC-SLP, BCS-CL, ASHA Fellow

Lissa Power-deFur is Professor Emeritus at Longwood University, where she was instrumental in establishing the graduate SLP program and has served as program director, chair, and interim dean. She has worked as a clinician in multiple clinical settings and as a special education administrator. She is an active volunteer for the profession – serving on various committees and boards at both the state and national levels.



Related Courses

Addressing Ethical Challenges Associated with Serving Children with Feeding and Swallowing Disorders in Schools
Presented by Lissa Power-deFur, PhD, CCC-SLP, BCS-CL, ASHA Fellow
Video
Course: #8804Level: Intermediate1 Hour
This course will review the incidence of children with feeding and swallowing in schools, the relationship to special education requirements, and common challenges that school-based SLPs face in addressing the needs of these children. It will discuss how to apply an ethical decision-making approach to these challenges, and provide specific ideas for resources to use in approaching the dilemma.

Eligibility Considerations Under IDEA and Section 504
Presented by Lissa Power-deFur, PhD, CCC-SLP, BCS-CL, ASHA Fellow
Video
Course: #9884Level: Intermediate1.5 Hours
This course discusses the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and Section 504 requirements for determining eligibility for services, as contrasted with clinical identification of a communication disorder. It addresses the disproportionate identification of certain racial-ethnic groups as eligible for special education, as well as recent recommendations from the U.S. Department of Education regarding students with long-term Covid.

Health Literacy: Ensuring We Are Understood
Presented by Lissa Power-deFur, PhD, CCC-SLP, BCS-CL, ASHA Fellow
Video
Course: #10305Level: Introductory1 Hour
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has identified that the majority of adults do not have proficient health literacy to understand health information, with some subgroups more adversely impacted than others. The status of health literacy in the U.S., and evidence-based strategies to ensure that information and services match individuals' capacity to understand and use them, are discussed in this course.

Serving as an Expert Witness: It’s in Our SLP Scope of Practice
Presented by Brenda Seal, PhD, CCC-SLP, ASHA Fellow, Lissa Power-deFur, PhD, CCC-SLP, BCS-CL, ASHA Fellow
Video
Course: #10129Level: Introductory1 Hour
SLPs may be asked to serve as an expert witness without prior experience, training, and/or guidance from our professional literature. This course offers guidance on terminology, procedures, cautions, cases, role plays, and recommendations for successful practice as an expert witness.

Decision-Making: What Science Tells Us About Approaching Ethical Dilemmas
Presented by Lissa Power-deFur, PhD, CCC-SLP, BCS-CL, ASHA Fellow
Video
Course: #9448Level: Intermediate1 Hour
This is Part 1 of a two-part series. This course will review the science of decision-making and how factors such as bias, cognitive dissonance, willful blindness, and “group think” may have an adverse influence on our ability to make thoughtful, well-informed decisions, including ethical decisions. Strategies that can minimize the influence of these factors and create more positive, achievable outcomes will be discussed.

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience. By using our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.