SpeechPathology.com Phone: 800-242-5183


EDU Healthcare Opportunities

20Q: Incorporating Montessori into Speech-Language Pathology Practice

20Q: Incorporating Montessori into Speech-Language Pathology Practice
Jennifer Brush, MA, CCC-SLP, Julia Johnson, MS, CCC-SLP
June 10, 2022

To earn CEUs for this article, become a member.

unlimited ceu access $129/year

Join Now
Share:

From the Desk of Ann Kummer

Figure

Montessori schools have been around for more than a hundred years. They date back to Dr. Maria Montessori's first school in Rome in 1907. Dr. Montessori was both a physician and educator. Based on her research, she came to believe that children learn best when they are allowed to learn by exploring their own interests. Montessori schools today use her education method which is child-centered and therefore, based on self-directed activities, hands-on learning, and collaborative play. Teachers guide the learning process by offering a variety of age-appropriate activities for the child to choose.

Although we think of the Montessori method as means for the education of children, the authors of this article discuss how this method is also successful in the treatment of adults with dementia using a person-centered approach.

Jennifer Brush and Julia Johnson have a great deal of experience working with the adult population who frequently experience dementia due to aging. In this article, they will describe how the Montessori method is just as appropriate for the aging population as it is for children. Here is more information about these authors:

Jennifer Brush, MA, CCC/SLP, Director, Brush Development is a Fulbright Specialist, researcher, award-winning dementia care author and healthcare consultant located in northeast Ohio.  Jennifer also serves as Program Director, Montessori Education for Dementia St. Nicholas Montessori College Ireland.  Jennifer is an inaugural member of the Association Montessori International (AMI) Advisory Board for Montessori for Dementia and Aging.  She was one of the first three AMI Certified Trainers for Montessori for Dementia and Aging in the world, as well as the first in the US.

Julia Johnson, MS, CCC/SLP, Program Manager at Brush Development has over 15 years of experience in long-term care settings.  She has extensive experience working with cognitive-language disorders affecting the adult and geriatric populations.  She is a university guest lecturer and has spoken nationally on interdisciplinary approaches to dementia care management for increasing awareness and involvement for caregivers and practitioners.  

I think this article will make you think more broadly about the Montessori method and person-centered care.

Now…read on, learn, and enjoy!

Ann W. Kummer, PhD, CCC-SLP, FASHA, 2017 ASHA Honors
Contributing Editor 

Browse the complete collection of 20Q with Ann Kummer CEU articles at www.speechpathology.com/20Q

20Q: Incorporating Montessori into Speech-Language Pathology Practice

Learning Outcomes

After this course, readers will be able to: 

  • Describe key aspects of person-centered care for elders with dementia.
  • Describe at least two ways to connect the Montessori philosophy of care with speech therapy services.
  • List three key components of the Montessori philosophy.
J BrushJennifer Brush
J JohnsonJulia Johnson

1. Over the last several years there has been a shift in elder care communities from “institutional” to Person-Centered Care (PCC). What has this movement focused on?

Person-centered care (PCC) seeks to maximize participation of the person and his/her healthcare choices by focusing on the whole person, not only the disease.  Person-centered care furthermore emphasizes the relationship between the healthcare recipient and professional as well as the context in which healthcare services are delivered (Kitson et al., 2013).  A person-centered approach capitalizes on an individual’s remaining functional, emotional, and cognitive abilities and implements compensatory techniques when weaknesses are present. It takes into account individual factors of family, partnership, culture, and gender as the individual is a respected member of the healthcare team (Epp, 2003).  Akin to the Life Participation Approach to Aphasia (LPAA), participation in meaningful, realistic, and naturalistic contexts are emphasized as avenues toward authentic communication opportunities. PCC finds its origins in the World Health Organization’s International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health which supports activity and participation in life irrespective of a person’s disease (WHO, 2001). Person-centered services for dementia person-centered approach to care places the person with dementia or other cognitive impairment in the ‘center’ of all decision-making. It emphasizes the inherent personhood, autonomy, and dignity of the human being, irrespective of documented cognitive impairment.  As such, this philosophy of care supports uncovering capabilities, modifying the environment to support optimal functioning, and capitalizing on strengths of the individual.

2. As we look at speech-language pathologists providing services from the PCC approach, how are they qualified to provide services that are supportive of persons with dementia?

Speech-Language Pathologists are independent practitioners who are qualified to provide unique services to support communication for individuals with dementia (Swan et al., 2018).  To meet the complex communication needs of elders with dementia, it is critical that SLPs provide services that maximize overall health outcomes and elder priorities. For example, treating a memory deficit outside of the elder’s natural context may not lead to functional improvement or be meaningful to the individual or their families.  In as much as the field has progressed toward more functional approaches, social exchanges, and naturalistic contexts, it can still be challenging for SLPs to reprise the role of “coach” or “strengths detective” when serving individuals with dementia or other cognitive impairments. Although a strengths-based focus can support trust and positive relationships among the SLP and the person and their family, it may be difficult to implement for clinicians due to the need to rely on more informal measures such as interviewing and/or attending to person and family narratives (Tedeschi, Kilmer 2005). Providing evidence-based, skilled services also involves increasing engagement with elders and their families and optimizing the ability of those elders to participate in purposeful activities.

3. Who is Dr. Maria Montessori and how does her work play a role in the philosophies developed for persons with dementia?

Maria Montessori was an Italian physician and educator who pioneered an approach to education that builds on the way children naturally learn. She created learning environments for children in which everything was suitable for their stage of development and where obstacles to learning and development were removed. She observed how children absorb knowledge from their surroundings, essentially teaching themselves. Through scientific study, she designed learning materials that nurtured children’s natural desire to learn. She was an innovator, feminist, and idealist who believed that the path to world peace was through the education of children (Brush, 2020). 

Dr. Montessori did not design environments for older adults, but researchers, clinicians, and architects have contributed to a large body of evidence that has resulted in aging and dementia care guidelines to bring engagement and purpose to elders with dementia (Brush, 2020).

4. What is Montessori for Aging and Dementia?

Montessori for Aging and Dementia is based on the principles of free choice and purposeful activity.  In a Montessori community for elders, individuals with a wide range of abilities work both individually and collaboratively on an array of activities from which they are free to choose, explore, and discover (Brush, 2020).  Elders have the freedom to move within the community and engage in household roles and responsibilities.

5. What key components are integral to having a Montessori community?

Dr. Maria Montessori believed that “an environment must be rich in motives that lend interest to an activity and invites the person to conduct his own experiences.”  In a Montessori community for older adults, individuals with a wide range of abilities work both individually and collaboratively on an array of activities from which they are free to choose, explore, and discover. Elders have the freedom to move within the community, and to engage in household roles and responsibilities, guided as needed by trained Montessori staff. Montessori focuses on the well-being of the whole person, including physical, spiritual, social, mental, and emotional needs (Brush, 2020). This means that the community should offer opportunities for new learning, religious practices, meditation, art, music, and exercise.  This is done by having a prepared environment, providing freedom of movement, elevating time for concentration, allowing for individual engagement, having community staff take time to observe, and providing grace and courtesy.  Overall, it is an approach that helps individuals change the way they interrelate with elders with dementia by improving the quality of those interactions (Bourgeois, et al., 2015).

6. How can clinicians connect PCC and Montessori philosophies?

A Montessori approach to life ensures that elders with dementia participate in meaningful activities. In Montessori for Aging and Dementia, a person maintains their roles and identity throughout the full course of their life. This philosophy of care focuses on engaging the Montessori Person-Centered Services for Dementia for an older adult in an environment that is adapted to support memory loss and sensory impairment and facilitate independence (Bourgeois, et al., 2015). As a result, elders are empowered to care for themselves and others, make contributions to their community, and engage in meaningful activities.  Montessori goals for individuals with dementia include: to enable individuals to be as independent as possible; to make important contributions and have a meaningful place in the home and community; and to possess high self-esteem (Brush & Norris, 2017).

7. In having SLPs work at the top of their licenses, is there evidence that supports the Montessori practices?

In addition to being appealing to elders and their families, Montessori activities additionally boast a strong scientific evidence base. For example, a significant reduction in antipsychotic and sedative medication was noted after the implementation of Montessori activities; this reduction in medication was noted to be maintained at an 18-month follow-up as well (Roberts, et al., 2015). The implementation of a Montessori environment resulted in more quality communicative interactions as well as improved overall well-being.  Similarly, elders who engaged in Montessori training displayed fewer feeding difficulties and an increased ability to feed themselves independently (Shepard, McArthur, & Hitzig, 2016). The evidence to support Montessori-based interventions is present and continues to be accumulated; however, SLPs may struggle to connect results of these studies with the realities of their clinical practices.

8. What are the specific components of Montessori that are required for implementation?

The Montessori philosophy is a way of life that is found throughout a care community.  With that said, there are several components that need to be incorporated in order for elders to engage, be purposeful, and live at their highest functional ability (Brush, 2020).  They include:  a prepared environment, freedom of movement, hands-on activity, intrinsic motivation, observation (by staff), concentration, individualized engagement, and grace and courtesy. 

9. What does an SLP need to do to bring those components into their scope of practice?

SLPs have the ability to be investigators and to look at communication and task performance in a different way than other disciplines.  In this way, during an elder’s initial evaluation and ongoing assessment, SLPs can use their understanding of communication, comprehension, executive function, and attention to identify areas that elders can be assisted with during treatment interventions. Then, those findings can lead to methods of engagement with other healthcare professionals and family members during daily interactions and activity performance.

10. What is an example of a “prepared environment”?

A prepared environment should support the individual by placing needed memory, visual, auditory, tactile, and olfactory cues in the environment.  An orderly or visually organized environment provides useful cues and allows for attention to tasks. High contrast signage is used to compensate for memory deficits and invite the individuals to engage in the environment (Brush & Norris, 2017). For example, one might see a nicely framed sign by potted plants and a watering can that says, “Please water the flowers.”  One can care for the environment by cleaning, washing, dusting, tidying, serving, folding, weeding, raking, planting, and so forth, as done in the past. In addition, when elders decorate and personalize their spaces with meaningful and beautiful items such as family photos, flowers, or their own handicrafts, they may create a sense of belonging to the environment (Calkins, 2018).

11. How do SLPs perform their assessments to incorporate these new concepts?

Understanding insurance and the need for as much standardization as possible, an SLP can perform a standardized assessment to gain objective data, but it is also recommended that they perform a person-centered assessment to drive intervention decisions. If the purpose of the assessment is to promote better functioning in one’s environment, standard assessments may not be very useful toward this goal. In this case, a contextualized evaluation will be of benefit.  A contextualized evaluation involves assessing the person’s environment, communication partners, and current daily activities. In this way, the clinician “flips the rehab model” (Bourgeois, et al., 2016) and spends assessment time focusing on identifying cognitive-communication needs that will have robust impacts on day-to-day functioning. 

12. What would be required to perform a solid contextualized assessment on an elder?

Identification of needs likely begins with observing the elder in his or her natural environment including during activities of daily living, meals, community activities, and interactions with staff. A review of the current medical chart, nurses’ notes, and conversations with staff will point the SLP toward useful intervention targets. Additional assessment items should also include sensory abilities, compensatory cues, reading, personal interests, occupation, social network, complaints and preferences, and environmental and social barriers to participation.  The clinician needs to look at the elder as a whole in order to determine the best place to start treatment and what other individuals in the elder’s life need to be involved from the outset.

13. Is there anything additional that should be included in the standardized or contextualized assessment? 

A reading assessment should be performed with each elder.  Research indicates that reading is one of the last functions people with dementia lose, so knowing a person’s level of reading, size of font needed, and comprehension of information read is crucial (Brush, 2020).  This will allow clinicians to assist care staff in creating cue cards and other visual cues that support the elder’s success during treatment as well as in the community.  Reading assessments should be performed with phrases/sentences that increase in length and font size.  In this way, a clinician can determine what size is required and what level of comprehension is present.  This is also a good way to keep baseline data to know when an elder has a decline in function so cues can be changed for him/her for personal use. 

14. Please share a scenario that could be used as an example for clinicians.

Mrs. Jones is 87 years old and was referred for speech-language pathology services because of a change in cognitive status, increased difficulty communicating her needs, and word-finding difficulties. Once a very social person, Mrs. Jones now remains in her room for most of the day. Information gathered from Mrs. Jones, her primary care partner at the care community, and her family revealed that she is a mother of three and a former second-grade teacher. She taught piano as a second job and enjoyed attending church services on a regular basis. Her husband passed away over ten years ago. She has been living in assisted living for three years. Staff has noted that she has been reluctant to leave her room recently and is not participating in activities. Mrs. Jones is ambulatory with her walker, reads at the short paragraph level (size 16 type, sans serif), speaks in complete sentences, and continues to play the piano. She has word-finding difficulties, easily becomes lost, and repetitively asks about her husband and her children. She often asks for her suitcase so she can pack to go home. She wears glasses and one hearing aid.  Mrs. Jones is a typical elder that would reside in a community, but the difference will be seen in how the clinician creates intervention strategies for treatment and education for the care team.

15. Most SLPs have a good handle on what they would do with a client like this, so with the incorporation of Montessori, how does the focus change?

Mrs. Jones’ background and care needs will drive her skilled speech therapy intervention. Mrs. Jones is a mother, teacher, and church pianist, and her biggest care need is that she becomes restless and distressed upon the thought of her deceased husband. Intervention targets would be driven by Mrs. Jones embodying the roles of literacy leader and community pianist.  So, as you can see, it takes the focus from task orientation in treatment to something larger for beyond the treatment space.  How the clinician treats the elder won’t change, but how and where the clinician incorporates the “function” is the difference.  PCC is based upon having the person “do” what they are still able to and by looking at treatment this way, the clinicians are following that prescription. 

16. Clinicians understand and enjoy the concept of moving to function, but how does the clinician develop goals to address evidence-based practice this way?

Skilled speech therapy goals can be constructed by connecting the Montessori philosophy with evidence-based practices. The following goals highlight this connection:

  1. Mrs. Jones will decrease question-asking about her husband from 50 to 2 times per day when redirected to a personalized activity by reading a visual reminder card with minimal assistance.
  2. Mrs. Jones will decrease the number of times she waits by the elevator for her husband from 10 to 1 time per day by incorporating a reading to a friend activity immediately after meals.
  3. Mrs. Jones will initiate conversation from 0 to 3 times daily with at least 2 different elders in her community by inviting them to read or listen to her play the piano.
  4. Mrs. Jones will read large print short stories, newspaper and magazine articles of personal interest to another individual with dementia who has lost her reading skills by referring to an external cue card on her walker from 0 times per week to 4 times per week.
  5. Mrs. Jones will engage in playing the piano which capitalizes on her residual procedural memory and communication skills, given appropriate environmental cues and supports in 8 out of 10 weekly opportunities (Hopper, Douglas, & Khayum, 2015).

17. For many care communities, this may be a departure from the daily culture, so how can clinicians educate/train care team members on the strategies they are employing with the elder during treatment?

Evidence-based approaches are also available to the SLP in terms of staff training on communication supports and strategies. For example, role-play, deliberate practice and coaching models support the transfer of knowledge to needed behavior changes. Effective training programs tend to employ multiple modalities such as video, print, and live demonstration and they are tailored to the specific needs of the individuals. Training in short, "in the moment" bursts are often more impactful than a longer didactic session and a collaborative approach is often helpful.  By recognizing the contributions of the trainees and attending to outcomes data of training, SLPs can provide skilled intervention in this arena as well (Knowles, Holton, & Swanson, 2005).

18. To change the direction a little bit from skilled treatment to early identification of persons having MCI, how can clinicians assist them with the use of Montessori principles?

SLPs have a great opportunity to play a pivotal role in the community to provide support and education for this population (Bourgeois, et al., 2016).  Most SLPs are more than familiar with the barriers of introducing treatment or strategies to elders in the early stages.  Often being met with, “I don’t have any problems with my memory.” Or, “I am able to take care of xxx without any trouble, who said I have a problem with that”?  In these cases, SLPs need to be well educated in dementia to understand nuance and evidence-based interventions and be reliable with those interventions during treatment (both inpatient and outpatient treatment).  So, having assistance from the care community to implement some basic changes with the type of activities elders can access or participate in (group or individual), brighten up spaces with paint or décor that helps with wayfinding, or even something as simple as having everyone where name tags (elders included) at least at community events (Brush, 2020), helps everyone feel included and at ease.

19. The number of elders with dementia and other neurodegenerative diseases will continue to rise for years to come.  What is a takeaway for clinicians who may be new to treating this population?

Our role as SLPs should be to help a person with cognitive impairment to live the life they choose to live.  We can achieve this by identifying and capitalizing on their spared abilities, modifying the physical and social environments to support their impaired systems such as memory, and continually supporting and involving families and care staff through the entire process.  Helping others adds purpose and meaning to our lives.  People with dementia have the same desire to contribute to their households or the community; the need to be productive does not end once the diagnosis of dementia has been given (Bourgeois, et al., 2016).  These elders require positive reinforcement that they are valued even if what they contribute is different than it once was.

20. As SLPs finish reading this how can they do more for the elders in their care communities?

The range of cognitive impairment and the diversity of treatment needs of these persons necessitate a variety of meaningful interventions that are tailored to the specific needs of the individuals. Effective rehabilitation interventions for elders with dementia include more than using memory interventions or creating reminder cues. A person-centered approach means that care teams collaborate to provide opportunities for independent functioning and achievement of functional goals. SLPs are encouraged to enhance their methods of providing person-centered care for individuals who are living with dementia by incorporating the Montessori philosophy. As SLPs, our role is to collaborate with individuals with dementia, to help them uncover strengths in their abilities, and to help them succeed at doing what they want to do.

References

Bourgeois, M., Brush, J., Douglas, N., Khayum, R., & Rogalski, E. (2016). Will you still need me when I’m 64, or 84, or 104? The importance of speech-language pathologists in promoting the quality of life of aging in adults in the United States into the future. Seminars in Speech and Language, 37,185-200.

Bourgeois, M., Brush, J., Elliot, G., & Kelly A. (2015). Join the revolution: how Montessori for aging and dementia can change long-term care culture. Seminars in Speech and Language, 36, 209-214.

Brush JA., Norris K. Getting started with Montessori volume 1: practical life activities for Elders.  Brush Development; 2017.

Brush, J. Montessori for Elder and Dementia Care. Health Professions Press. (2020)

Calkins, M. (2018). From research to application: supportive and therapeutic environments for people living with dementia. The Gerontologist, 58, S114-S128.

Epp, T. (2003). Person-centered dementia care: a vision to be refined. The Canadian Alzheimer Disease Review, 14-18.

Kitson, A., Marshall, A., Bassett, K., Zeitz, K. (2013). What are the core elements of patient-centered care? A narrative review and synthesis of the literature from health policy, medicine and nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69, 4-15.

Knowles, M, Holton, E., Swanson R. (2005). The adult learner: the definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (6th ed). Boston: Elsevier; 2005.

Roberts, G., Morley, C., Walters, W., Malta, S., Doyle, C. (2015). Caring for people with dementia in residential aged care: successes with a composite model featuring Montessori-based activities. Geriatric Nursing, 36,106-110.

Sheppard, C., McArthur, C., Hitzig, S. A systematic review of Montessori-based activities for persons with dementia. (2016). Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 17, 117-122.

Swan, K., Hopper, M., Wenke, R., Jackson, C., Till, T., Conway, E. (2018). Speech-language pathologist interventions for communication in moderate-severe dementia: a systematic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology.

Tedeschi, R., Kilmer, R. (2005). Assessing strengths, resilience, and growth to guide clinical interventions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 230-237.

World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.

Citation

Brush, J. & Johnson, J. (2022). 20Q: Incorporating Montessori into Speech-Language Pathology Practice. SpeechPathology.com. Article 20515. Available at www.speechpathology.com

To earn CEUs for this article, become a member.

unlimited ceu access $129/year

Join Now

jennifer brush

Jennifer Brush, MA, CCC-SLP

Jennifer Brush, MA, CCC/SLP, Director, Brush Development is a Fulbright Specialist, researcher, award-winning dementia care author and healthcare consultant located in northeast Ohio.  Jennifer also serves as Program Director, Montessori Education for Dementia St. Nicholas Montessori College Ireland.  Jennifer is an inaugural member of the Association Montessori International (AMI) Advisory Board for Montessori for Dementia and Aging.  She was one of the first three AMI Certified Trainers for Montessori for Dementia and Aging in the world, as well as the first in the US.


julia johnson

Julia Johnson, MS, CCC-SLP

Julia Johnson, MS, CCC/SLP, Program Manager at Brush Development has over 15 years of experience in long term care settings.  She has extensive experience working with cognitive-language disorders affecting the adult and geriatric populations.  She is a university guest lecturer and has spoken nationally on interdisciplinary approaches to dementia care management for increasing awareness and involvement for caregivers and practitioners. 



Related Courses

20Q: Infection Control Strategies for SLPs
Presented by A.U. Bankaitis Smith, PhD
Text
Course: #9729Level: Intermediate1 Hour
Speech-language pathologists are expected by policy authorities to apply appropriate measures to protect patients, co-workers and themselves in clinical situations that may expose individuals to infectious microbes. This article provides practical guidelines for implementing infection control principles within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, including discussion of personal protective equipment (PPE) and disinfecting and cleaning products.

20Q: In the Thick of It - The International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI)
Presented by Jennifer Raminick, MA, CCC-SLP, BCS-S, Danielle Ward, MA, CCC-SLP
Text
Course: #10756Level: Intermediate1 Hour
The importance of using IDSSI to provide standardized language when speaking about texture modification is discussed in this course. Comparisons of IDDSI and the National Dysphagia Diet (NDD), as well as IDDSI standards for pediatric vs. adult patients are presented. Additionally, potential barriers, solutions, and frequently asked questions related to implementation of IDDSI are described.

20Q: Induced Laryngeal Obstruction - An Overview for Speech-Language Pathologists
Presented by Robert Brinton Fujiki, PhD, CCC-SLP
Text
Course: #10761Level: Intermediate1 Hour
The nature of induced laryngeal obstruction, including comorbidities and causes, and the speech-language pathologist’s role in evaluation and treatment of this disorder are described in this course. Current diagnostic and treatment practices and research updates pertaining to the condition are discussed.

20Q: Early Childhood Stuttering: Less-Direct and More-Direct Treatment
Presented by J. Scott Yaruss, PhD, CCC-SLP, BCS-F, Nina Reardon-Reeves, MS, CCC-SLP, BCS-F
Text
Course: #8978Level: Intermediate1 Hour
The key issues in the treatment of early childhood stuttering, with a focus on less-direct and more-direct treatment approaches are addressed in this course. Ways that clinicians can draw upon various approaches to develop individualized treatment so that each child’s and family’s individual needs are addressed are discussed.

20Q: Dynamics of School-Based Speech and Language Therapy Variables
Presented by Kelly Farquharson, PhD, CCC-SLP, Anne Reed, MS, CCC-SLP
Text
Course: #10002Level: Advanced1 Hour
This course reviews dynamics of speech and language therapy variables such as session frequency, intervention intensity, and dosage, and how these are impacted by different service delivery models. It discusses how therapy outcomes are related to therapy quality, IEP goals, and SLP-level variables such as job satisfaction and caseload size.

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience. By using our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.